Austria
The NISG 2026, BGBl. I Nr. 94/2025, has applied in full since 1 October 2026.
NIS2 (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) covers organisations in the sectors in Annex I and Annex II. As a rule it applies from medium size: 50 or more staff, or annual turnover and balance sheet total both above EUR 10 million. Group figures can count. Some services are in scope at any size. The check is free and needs no account.
Indicative only, not legal advice.
Indicative result only. This is not a legal determination of your NIS2 status and not legal advice. Your status depends on national law and on any identification by your Member State. Confirm it with the competent authority or a qualified adviser.
Install free from GitHub (self-hosted). Core is the free self-hosted edition.
Answer with your activity, headcount, annual turnover, balance sheet total and Member State. Add linked and partner enterprises if you have them. Tick a designation box only if it might apply. The result names the Directive article that produced it: likely in scope as an essential entity, likely in scope as an important entity, likely out of scope, or a prompt to check a national designation. Domain name registration services are called out on their own.
Annex I is sectors of high criticality: energy, transport, banking, financial market infrastructures, health, drinking water, waste water, digital infrastructure, ICT service management (business to business), public administration and space. Annex II is other critical sectors: postal and courier services, waste management, chemicals, food, manufacturing, digital providers and research. The activity list in the form follows those annexes. It is a guide to the annex types, not a copy of every legal definition.
The thresholds come from Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC, which Article 2(1) of NIS2 uses. Medium means 50 or more employees, or annual turnover and annual balance sheet total both above EUR 10 million. Large means 250 or more employees, or turnover above EUR 50 million and balance sheet total above EUR 43 million. A figure that only meets one of the two money tests does not cross that money threshold.
Linked enterprises, above 50 percent control, are added in full. Partner enterprises, a holding from 25 to 50 percent, are added in proportion to the holding. Article 2(1) also says Article 3(4) of the Recommendation's Annex does not apply, so a public-sector shareholder does not by itself push an organisation over the line. Simplified: control can also arise from voting rights or the right to appoint the board, some investors at 25–50% don't count as partners, and a change of size category takes effect only after two consecutive years (Rec. 2003/361/EC Annex, Art. 3–4).
Size does not decide every case. Article 2(2) to Article 2(4) bring in some entities at any size, and a Member State can designate others.
Under Article 3(1), essential entities include Annex I entities above the medium-sized ceilings, qualified trust service providers, TLD name registries and DNS service providers of any size, and medium-sized or larger providers of public electronic communications networks or services. Central government public administration entities, as defined by national law, are essential (Art. 3(1)(d)). Regional public administration is in scope only after a national risk assessment (Art. 2(2)(f)(ii)). Local government and education institutions are in scope only where the Member State opts in (Art. 2(5)). Bodies working in national security, public security, defence or law enforcement are excluded (Art. 2(7)). Other entities that are in scope are important entities under Article 3(2), including medium-sized Annex I entities, medium-sized and large Annex II entities, and small or micro public electronic communications providers. Non-qualified trust service providers are essential if they exceed the medium-sized ceilings (Art. 3(1)(a)) and important otherwise (Art. 3(2)).
Article 32 is proactive supervision for essential entities. Article 33 is ex post supervision for important entities. Articles 20, 21 and 23 apply to both.
The NISG 2026, BGBl. I Nr. 94/2025, has applied in full since 1 October 2026.
The NIS2 law of 26 April 2024 has applied since 18 October 2024, supervised by the CCB.
The Kyberturvallisuuslaki (124/2025) has applied since 8 April 2025.
The NIS2UmsuCG, BGBl. 2025 I Nr. 301, has been in force since 6 December 2025.
The National Cyber Security Bill had not been published as of the Oireachtas answer of 20 October 2026.
Decreto legislativo 4 settembre 2024, n. 138 has applied since 16 October 2024.
The law of 5 May 2026 has applied since 10 May 2026. The competent authority is the ILR.
The Cyberbeveiligingswet, Stb. 2026, 187, has applied since 15 August 2026.
The Act of 23 January 2026, Dz. U. 2026 poz. 252, has applied since 3 April 2026.
ZInfV-1, Uradni list RS št. 40/2025, has applied since 19 June 2025.
The Cybersäkerhetslag (SFS 2025:1506) has applied since 15 January 2026.
Choose any of the 27 Member States in the form. Austria, Belgium, Finland, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Slovenia and Sweden show national notes, each with a last-checked date. Every other country says national details are coming soon. The scope result still uses the Directive.
GRCompliance is a self-hosted GRC product that can hold the measures, the risk register and the reporting clocks. Try the live demo on sample data, or book a gap review. For the product overview, see NIS2 compliance software and self-hosted install.
Indicative only, not legal advice. National transposition can add entities, change registration deadlines or name a different authority.
NIS2, Directive (EU) 2022/2555, applies to entities in Annex I or Annex II that are medium-sized or larger under Recommendation 2003/361/EC and that provide services in the Union (Article 2(1)). Some entities are in scope at any size, including providers of public electronic communications networks or services, trust service providers, DNS service providers, top-level domain name registries and domain name registration services (Article 2(2) to Article 2(4)). A Member State can also designate further entities.
Essential entities include large Annex I entities, qualified trust service providers, TLD name registries, DNS service providers, medium-sized or larger providers of public electronic communications networks or services, and central government public administration entities as defined by national law (Article 3(1)(d)). An entity identified as a CER critical entity is essential (Article 2(3), Article 3(1)(f)). Other in-scope Annex I and Annex II entities are important entities (Article 3(2)). Non-qualified trust service providers are essential if they exceed the medium-sized ceilings and important otherwise. Both essential and important entities have risk-management and incident-reporting duties. Supervision of essential entities is proactive (Article 32). Supervision of important entities is after the event (Article 33).
Usually not. The main rule starts at medium size: 50 or more staff, or both annual turnover and balance sheet total above EUR 10 million. Small and micro providers of public electronic communications are still important entities. Qualified trust service providers, DNS service providers and TLD name registries are essential at any size. A Member State can also designate a smaller entity.
Indicative only, not legal advice.
Confirm whether you must register, brief the management body under Article 20, compare your measures with Article 21(2), and prepare the Article 23 clocks: an early warning within 24 hours, an incident notification within 72 hours, and a final report no later than one month after the incident notification. You can try the GRCompliance demo or book a gap review.
Directive text: Directive (EU) 2022/2555 on EUR-Lex. Size test: Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC. Agency overview: ENISA.